Tuesday 18 Jun
 
 

Ninja III: The Domination

Don't ask why Ninja III: The Domination begins with a ninja assault on a municipal golf course. Just be grateful it does. You also may wonder why its sex scene employs a can of V8: Don't question it. Just lie back and enjoy it.
06/14/2013 | Comments 0

Lifeforce

Tobe Hooper got a raw deal. The director of horror hits The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and Poltergeist didn't deserve to be sent to movie jail for 1985's Lifeforce. It's a well-crafted, well-intentioned work that was mismarketed and misunderstood, losing a bundle of money and soon sending Hooper into the lands of episodic television and direct-to-video features.
06/14/2013 | Comments 0

Dead Souls

With Dead Souls, we can prove something about the Chiller cable network's original features that Remains could not: Source material is not to blame for their pervasive generic nature — it's the economy, stupid.
06/11/2013 | Comments 0

The Philadelphia Experiment

There's a theory about remakes that perhaps Hollywood should stop remaking good movies and instead remake the bad ones, so that they may be improved. The problem with that theory is one runs the risk of the remake being bad, too. Case in point: The Philadelphia Experiment.
06/12/2013 | Comments 0

Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters

A few surprising things about Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters:
• It comes from MTV Films,
• is produced by Will Ferrell,
• and is as fun as its title is dumb.
06/11/2013 | Comments 0
Home · Articles · Movies · Documentary · Con Artist
Documentary

Con Artist


The documentary ‘Con Artist’ is a brush with greatness — or is that arrogance? — as it profiles art-world scourge Mark Kostabi.

Rod Lott March 9th, 2011  

Con Artist
8 p.m. Friday-Saturday
Oklahoma City Museum of Art, 415 Couch
OKCMOA.com, 236-3100
$8, $6 seniors

It’s too bad Oklahoma City Museum of Art already has played the documentary “Exit Through the Gift Shop,” because it would make an ideal double feature with “Con Artist,” which is screening Friday and Saturday night.

Whereas “Exit” featured Banksy, an internationally famous artist so publicity-shy that his identity remains unknown, “Con” features Mark Kostabi, a internationally famous artist who can’t get enough press for his liking. In his own words, he’s “addicted to it.” The doc depicts his rise, fall and rise again, in spite of himself.

The “Con” of director Michael Sládek’s title holds two meanings: Kostabi is a conceptual artist, but also an admitted forger. Like his rival Jeff Koons, he’s a talent so in love with the almighty dollar that he rarely does any work anymore. Instead, he employs a staff of artists who copy Kostabi’s well-established style to make his every whim exist on the canvas. When it’s to his liking, he’ll sign it, while gleefully declaring that he’s committed yet another con.

Well, if he can be bothered to pick up the pen; his employees can replicate his distinctive John Hancock just as well.

Also adept at the piano, Kostabi is one talented guy, but his personality is another story, thereby making “Con Artist” imminently watchable. “Abrasive” and “obnoxious” are understatements when describing how he rubs his peers. In the film’s opening moments, he’s called everything from “a half-ass entertainer” to “Applebee’s aspiring to be Olive Garden.”

Is he for real, or is it all an act?

Some — OK, all — just don’t get him, as his interests veer toward public-access cable television, staging an elaborate yet still not entirely concrete game show called “Title This,” in which contestants offer names for his untitled paintings, for which they’re rewarded with $20 bills.

Viewers won’t quite get him, either, particularly after a bizarre, third-act meltdown that finds a presumably intoxicated Kostabi burning money, defacing his own paintings, farting into the camera and generally acting like a kindergartener who found — and promptly consumed — an entire sixpack of blue raspberry Jolt in the back of the pantry.

What does one make of a guy who, on one hand, had his statue of Pope Benedict XVI blessed by the subject himself, yet on the other, asks a room of Yale art students to whom he’s lecturing if anyone else has seen 11:11 pop up on digital clocks with regularity (and if any organization is looking into this)?

Is he for real, or is it all an act? I don’t have the answer, and neither does Sládek, but you’ll enjoy every awkward, outrageous minute of trying to get to bottom of his mad mystery of mirth and mischief.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close