Monday 28 Jul
 photo BO-Button1_zps13524083.jpg


OKG Newsletter

Home · Articles · DVDs · Thriller · The Phantom of Hollywood

The Phantom of Hollywood

Andrew Lloyd Webber spectacle < made-for-TV treatment.

Rod Lott September 30th, 2011

So simple is the story of Gaston Leroux's 1911 novel, "The Phantom of the Opera," that it continues to be remade on stage and screen. More interesting, however, are not its adaptations, but those that tweak the setting to more contemporary, even oddball venues.


Witness Brian De Palma's cult classic "Phantom of the Paradise," the '80s straight-to-VHS slasher "Phantom of the Mall" and the somewhat obscure "The Phantom of Hollywood," a 1974 CBS movie of the week now brought back to public consciousness via Warner Archive.

Without me telling you, you can guess its basic story points: The fictional Worldwide Studios has plans to demolish its backlot, which doesn't sit well with the masked, mace-wielding figure who lives among its sets and subterranean tunnels. Once he gets wind of it, he leaves notes and makes calls to studio execs (Rat Packer Peter Lawford among them) that amount to outright threats of death: "To destroy the backlot is to destroy yourself!"

They ignore him; fatal "accidents" happen; the Phantom kidnaps a lovely woman (Skye Aubrey, TV's "Vanished"); and things don't go as smoothly as he planned.

Given our overexposure to Leroux's plot, it's not at all taxing to guess the identity of the Phantom. This is no detraction, however; its very familiarity is comforting and welcome. The pleasures of this "Phantom," as with every twist-'em-up version, is seeing how the filmmakers will modernize each element of the original "Opera." So what if this one is a little insidery and self-congratulatory? It does not fail to entertain, and does so efficiently, in fewer than 75 minutes.

It's an added treat for old-school film buffs, as viewers not only see clips from celebrated movies like "The Wizard of Oz," but also get good glimpses of the MGM backlot, which ironically, was being destroyed at the time, which must be the only reason this nifty telefilm exists. Regardless, I'm glad it does. —Rod Lott
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5