Send me a dollar. Don't ask why. Don't ask what for; just do it.
Â
In a way, that is what our government says. Yes, the government budget does list categories where our money goes, and we do have a bunch of governmental services, but does anyone know how our dollars are spent?
Â
Our county treasurer tries to let us know where our real estate taxes go. His letter does show a break out on tax dollar distribution, which is a bit soothing, but the listing is at a high level " it doesn't tell us enough. For example, it doesn't mention the sinking fund.
Â
As the county's ad valorem tax distribution letter lay on my desk, I noticed the county was collecting a buck for my home city. Hmm, I wondered, my city already collects more than $2 million in sales taxes each month. What's the deal with this extra dollar?
Â
My wife said, "It's only a dollar. Don't sweat the small stuff."
Â
Her comment reminded me of a quote attributed to the late Illinois Sen. Everett Dirksen " "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
Â
To me, every dollar, whether a Federal Reserve note or a Susan B. Anthony coin, is real money. I assume most taxpayers think a dollar is real money, too.
Â
To find out how why the county is collecting this extra dollar, I called my city treasurer. Turns out, the dollar is being collected to pay for a lawsuit. To be specific, for a $258,000 judgment against the city.
Â
Two hundred and fifty-eight thousand dollars is real money. How many other tax dollars are going toward lawsuit settlements, I wondered?
Â
I checked the Oklahoma County Web site. Getting to their Web page was quick and easy. Trying to find the answer gave me an Excedrin headache.
Â
The clerk's page boasted of transparency and contained lots of data links. After an exhausting journey through the Web site, I finally found the sinking fund document I was looking for; a quick tally showed that the county had settled 33 lawsuits totaling over $2 million, not counting legal fees.
Â
One recent settlement for the county in the amount of $580,000 raised my eyebrows.
Â
Details of settlements like this are not spelled out in the ad valorem tax distribution letter, nor does the tax bill make mention that the settlement usually comes with a 9.25 percent interest payment.
Â
My concern is not simply about a dollar or how quickly dollars add up, but instead what the dollar represents.
Â
Thirty-three current lawsuits indicate that our government officials are making repeated errors. Two million dollars in settlements for those lawsuits is proof positive that oversight is lacking.
Â
So, exactly where are these problem areas?
Â
One document, which listed costs of legal services, shows that 88 percent of the costs were attributed to the county sheriff's office. Maybe we should start there?
Â
Why weren't our county commissioners monitoring performance? One reason, I am told, is due to a wording conflict between Title 19 and Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes. The state ties county commissioners' hands when it comes to asking for performance reports.
Â
It gets worse. I heard there is also a conflict between Title 19 and Title 57. Do you know how the county pays for prisoners' pre-existing health problems? Potentially this second conflict can cost the county another $2 million.
Â
No problem: Take out a loan; let 660,000 people share the cost over a number of years. It is only another dollar per person. Who's going to notice a dollar? - Richard PrawdzienskiÂ
 Â
Prawdzienski is an Edmond resident.
Â
In a way, that is what our government says. Yes, the government budget does list categories where our money goes, and we do have a bunch of governmental services, but does anyone know how our dollars are spent?
Â
Our county treasurer tries to let us know where our real estate taxes go. His letter does show a break out on tax dollar distribution, which is a bit soothing, but the listing is at a high level " it doesn't tell us enough. For example, it doesn't mention the sinking fund.
Â
As the county's ad valorem tax distribution letter lay on my desk, I noticed the county was collecting a buck for my home city. Hmm, I wondered, my city already collects more than $2 million in sales taxes each month. What's the deal with this extra dollar?
Â
My wife said, "It's only a dollar. Don't sweat the small stuff."
Â
Her comment reminded me of a quote attributed to the late Illinois Sen. Everett Dirksen " "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
Â
To me, every dollar, whether a Federal Reserve note or a Susan B. Anthony coin, is real money. I assume most taxpayers think a dollar is real money, too.
Â
To find out how why the county is collecting this extra dollar, I called my city treasurer. Turns out, the dollar is being collected to pay for a lawsuit. To be specific, for a $258,000 judgment against the city.
Â
Two hundred and fifty-eight thousand dollars is real money. How many other tax dollars are going toward lawsuit settlements, I wondered?
Â
I checked the Oklahoma County Web site. Getting to their Web page was quick and easy. Trying to find the answer gave me an Excedrin headache.
Â
The clerk's page boasted of transparency and contained lots of data links. After an exhausting journey through the Web site, I finally found the sinking fund document I was looking for; a quick tally showed that the county had settled 33 lawsuits totaling over $2 million, not counting legal fees.
Â
One recent settlement for the county in the amount of $580,000 raised my eyebrows.
Â
Details of settlements like this are not spelled out in the ad valorem tax distribution letter, nor does the tax bill make mention that the settlement usually comes with a 9.25 percent interest payment.
Â
My concern is not simply about a dollar or how quickly dollars add up, but instead what the dollar represents.
Â
Thirty-three current lawsuits indicate that our government officials are making repeated errors. Two million dollars in settlements for those lawsuits is proof positive that oversight is lacking.
Â
So, exactly where are these problem areas?
Â
One document, which listed costs of legal services, shows that 88 percent of the costs were attributed to the county sheriff's office. Maybe we should start there?
Â
Why weren't our county commissioners monitoring performance? One reason, I am told, is due to a wording conflict between Title 19 and Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes. The state ties county commissioners' hands when it comes to asking for performance reports.
Â
It gets worse. I heard there is also a conflict between Title 19 and Title 57. Do you know how the county pays for prisoners' pre-existing health problems? Potentially this second conflict can cost the county another $2 million.
Â
No problem: Take out a loan; let 660,000 people share the cost over a number of years. It is only another dollar per person. Who's going to notice a dollar? - Richard PrawdzienskiÂ
 Â
Prawdzienski is an Edmond resident.


